In the opening scene of Bock’s intimate, intriguing new work, a college lecturer quotes from Lewis Hyde’s 1979 book The Gift, in which the scholar posited that creatives are hindered by a market economy but thrive in a gift economy, one in which something is offered with the expectation of trade rather than commodification.
That this scene turns out to be a metatheatrical false start—part of a play within the play, staged by the titular small-town theater troupe—does nothing to diminish the import of Bock’s invocation. His play concerns the erosion of the Flowers as a found family, spurred by the clash within the gay couple at its helm: One man (Bruch Reed) is so devoted to the safe, insular group he’s fostered that he’s willing time and again to toss aside his own work (including that play-within) for another crowd-pleasing R&J revival; his long-term partner (Benjamin Sprunger) feels claustrophobic and longs for new frontiers.
This tension between the need to give back to the community that’s fueled you and the pitfall of walling yourself off inside a ghetto—gay, artistic or familial—seems to be at the heart of Bock’s question. It remains unanswered, but it’s addressed thoughtfully and engagingly in Cullman’s production, which makes smart use of the playwright’s co-opting of theater clichés (the talk-back, the audition, an extended scene from Shakespeare) to illustrate the dilemma. Reed’s detailed, lived-in performance as a put-upon artist provides an anchor that’s appropriately both solid and unsure.
Features
A quirky and sort of uneven play but worth seeing. Especially for the performances which are strong. A big shout out to Bruch Reed, who is at the top of his game in a difficult role
The play has some complex transitions, but I think it has some funny funny moments, and it is comedy. Let us remember that comedy is about distortion and obsession, not realism that is so pedestrian it shouldn't be on the stage. I thought is a poignant lovely little comedy.
Under Piatt, TO was a trusted resource for artists to get feedback and for audiences to get a dynamic and informed point of view to contrast with their own. Under Vire, it has lost its identifty and value to the theatre community. Unlike many publications, Vire has the luxury of using 250 words to offer a point of view. Instead he offers a plot summary with 2 sentences about the actual production. We all want AFT to succeed, Kris, but avoiding the weaknesses of the show can't be good for anyone.
This was a terrific show. Intriguing, well thought out and excellently acted. It's dramatic and comedic at the same time. Very entertaining and I think I'm actually going to go see it again!
Are you kidding? This play was horrendous from the opening moments through every over-acted, self-indulgent moment to the pointless and hollow end. Please, everyone, spare yourselves.